PUBLICATIONS DON’T SHOW THE EVIDENCE FOR A VIRUS OR A GENOME BY WHICH THE VIRUS COULD BE DEFIND

Mar 15, 2021

When you hear for the first time a technical story like that of the alleged Pandemic, virus SARS-CoV-2 and the disease COVID-19, it can become quite overwhelming.

But now anybody can start to comprehend these subjects of great importance. In this video, I would like to introduce the people of Project Immanuel, which critically examines the scientific background of the so-called “Corona Crisis.” With the help of scientist and ex-virologist Dr Stefan Lanka, all fundamental publications on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 are closely scrutinized and scientifically examined.

The main objective is to make science understandable to everyone. Therefore, all the necessary technical terms and scientific procedures of virology and microbiology that one needs to know and understand are explained in a way that is easy for everyone to comprehend and illustrated with many examples.

So humanity is facing a dilemma?

(I have transcribed the video below to the best of my ability, because of the translation, there are some syntactical anomalies etc.)

The so-called Corona crisis changed much of the world in 2020, not precisely for the better. A return to the old norm, as many people would like to see, is definitely no longer possible, and the so-called new bar scares many people and rightly so. The question is whether another future might be possible rather than the so-called new normality. Perhaps we can overcome this crisis and use it as a real chance for everyone in the world.

The corona crisis spectre still has a firm grip on large parts of the world while some are still afraid of an infection with a killer virus called SARS-CoV-2. Others fear mandatory vaccination programs and the loss of all their fundamental human rights. Consequently, for months, people have been arguing about the proportionality of the measures taken to prevent infections, including lockdowns and social distancing rules, and about the validity of statistics and controversial laboratory tests.

People are infuriated with each other, and even after months, there still seems to be no sign of the situation easing. However, all sides agree on one thing; things cannot go on like this. So how does humanity manage to get out of this so-called pandemic crisis? Must we continue to imprison one another and hope the COVID vaccine will cause as few adverse effects as possible? Must many more people be tested for SARs-CoV-2? Must many more studies be analysed and numbers and statistics evaluated, or should we take a step back and look at the foundation of this so-called pandemic?

The measures implemented to prevent infections and all reporting are based on risk assessment, statistics and tests and what are these based on? On alleged viral evidence, that is, on scientific papers claiming to have proven the existence of a new dangerous pathogen, even though many critical voices regarding Corona from the fields of virology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and immunology, very few seem to be looking at the scientific foundation of the whole crisis. 

Scientists worldwide seem only to be arguing about case numbers and opinions. The question arises as to why all these critical scientists doubt the benefit of the measures to prevent infections and criticise tests and statistics. But when it comes to the evidence for the virus itself, they seem to take for granted that the existence of the virus has been proven in a flawless serious and scientific manner.

Why? Why is everyone so sure about this in the corona crisis? We have witnessed so many unscientific methods, contradictions and boundless exaggerations. So why is it that the scientific foundation is assumed to have been proven beyond a doubt? Is it because virologists worldwide have reviewed the publications of their Chinese colleagues, as would be their duty as serious scientists? Or, on the contrary, is it because they have never verified these publications and they assume, as everyone does, that the proof of the existence of the virus has been provided?

One of the Virologists known for reviewing these scientific papers is the German Virologist Dr Stefan Lanka. From the beginning, Dr Lanka has publicly questioned the evidence of SARS-CoV-2. But how exactly does he explain his doubts about the validity of the publications?

Dr Stefan Lanka Speaking

Dr Stefan Lanka is a molecular biologist & virologist (he received his PhD in 1994 and became a doctor of natural science). Editor-in-chief of the science magazine Wissenschaffplus (about biology, medicine, social issues and technology)

My doubts are justified by the fact that these publications don’t show evidence of a virus or a genome by which the virus could be defined. Nowhere in the magazines has the viral genome been evidenced. Nowhere has its length been determined; instead, a conceptual construct of the alleged genetic strand of a virus is created. To do this, samples are taken from sick people, short genetic fragments are extracted, or genetic material is generated in a laboratory by letting cells die in test tubes. These short pieces are then used to theoretically assemble a viral genome strand based on a predefined (computer) model.

A complete actual genome of a virus never appears in the scientific literature, not even for a single one. However, it would be straightforward to demonstrate the presence of such a nucleic acid if it were there. The strands of genetic material are called nucleic acids. Detecting their presence and determining their lengths would be pretty straightforward. The required standard techniques have been available for many decades. However, they are never employed in virology. Likewise, the claim that the existence of entire genetic material, also called the genome of a virus is not substantiated.

Anyone proficient in English who adds around five to ten technical words to their vocabulary can check this by studying the relevant publications. Three key publications need to be explored in the case of COVID, the new SARS virus. By doing so, everybody will be able to see the false assumption underlying the concept of the coronavirus. Furthermore, one will immediately see that the detection method established for SARS-CoV-2 merely detects molecules produced in every metabolism.

Project Imanuel Speaks

These are the three seminal publications on SARS-CoV-2. In two of these, the existence of the new coronavirus was allegedly proven. On the other, a specific laboratory test was claimed to have been developed for its detection in the human body. Virology has long-established distinct logical and verifiable criteria for detecting a pathogen. But, of course, science generally provides clear, logical rules for when a paper may be classified as scientific.

Let’s briefly go through these required criteria step by step and review how many were fulfilled in the three papers on SARS-CoV-2.

  • First, do the three publications fulfil the basic formal requirements for a scientific paper? Yes, all three of them meet the requirements.

  • Secondly, were the papers peer-reviewed by independent experts before publication? No, this only happened for two pieces; one in which the German Virologist Christian Drosten was involved was published without peer review.

  • Third, were there thorough investigations of other possible causes of respiratory diseases? No, other possible non-viral causes were not taken into account.

  • Fourth, was a pathogen isolated? No, this would have been one of the most critical steps in improving its existence! One paper claims isolation, but nothing was ever done that could remotely be considered as the isolation of a pathogen.

  • Fifth, was a pathogen biochemically characterised? No, how could it be without prior isolation?

  • Sixth, was it possible to determine a pathogen as the cause of respiratory diseases? No, without prior isolation, this is also impossible.

  • Seventh, is there evidence for the transmissibility of the diseases? No, transmissibility is based only on superficial appearance and unreliable laboratory tests.

  • Eight, is there evidence that Covid19 is a distinct specific disease? No, COVID- 19 is nothing more than a mixture of long-known symptoms and entire clinical pictures that can have various causes.

  • Ninth, has the claimed viral genome ever been detected in nature in humans, animals or plants? As Dr Lanka has already mentioned, the genome of SARS-CoV-2 is nothing more than a computer-generated theoretical construct consisting of endogenous components and fictitious segments that have been generated using software programs.

  • Ten, is there a validated, reliable specific detection method for the suspected pathogen suitable for diagnostic purposes? Unfortunately, the polymerase chain reaction or PCR is a molecular biology method that has been wholly misused for diagnosing viruses for years.

  • Eleven, were every procedure, every method, every laboratory result, and every conclusion substantiated with valid control experiments and control groups? No, there was no proper control in all three papers. This is the foundation of the so-called corona pandemic.

Scientific papers that fail just about every criterion require no isolation – no evidence of a virus – no control experiments – which means it’s not scientific. If the corona crisis is to be ended, the question of proof regarding SARS-CoV-2 must, at last, be openly posted. Only by doing this can the so-called pandemic be brought to an end. Once and for all, this does not mean respiratory diseases will cease. Still, it does mean that we will stop falsely attributing all illnesses to one and the exact allegedly contagious cause.

Consequently, by presenting Dr Lanka’s findings, people with these illnesses will no longer get the incorrect treatment. We don’t want to throw another expert’s hat into the ring; there are enough so-called corona experts out there already. With Dr Lanka’s assistance, we want to completely take apart the alleged evidence for SARS-CoV-2 and subject it to scientific scrutiny; hence this project is not about opinions but only about what is scientifically proven, logically comprehensible and verifiable by anyone.

We will not simply state something but prove what we say in doing. This will demonstrate how you can verify all of our statements for yourself. So don’t consume this project; above all, don’t believe a word we say. Be critical and question our views; only this is scientific and the core of our project. This is the Emmanuel Project our common goal should not only be to overcome the Corona crisis but to work together to ensure that nothing like this can ever happen again!

It is not sufficient to depend unquestioningly on so-called experts to achieve the same. Everyone has to find out for themselves and take responsibility. This global crisis can be a real opportunity for all of us. Additional information on all the videos and articles we publish can be downloaded, from all the internet platforms, forwarded and uploaded again on your channels on the condition that nothing within them is changed. We will gradually translate the videos and articles into other languages. You can find us on various platforms such as Bitchute and Telegram and, of course, on our website.

Appeal if you are a virologist or bioinformatician and would like to help conduct the necessary control experiments that can end the corona crisis once and for all, don’t hesitate to get in touch with Dr Stefan Lanka at the following email address:

Blog       Contact       Terms and Disclaimers       Privacy Policy